Categories
Blog Post

Andy Burnham’s Housing First philosophy

In last week’s speech laying out his economic vision, Andy Burnham confirmed what many in the homelessness sector have been speculating about since he entered the leadership contest. Should he become Prime Minister, Burnham intends to adopt a ‘national housing first philosophy’ based on the premise that ‘everything starts with a good home’.

This is extremely welcome news and something Crisis and Homeless Link have long advocated for: to end rough sleeping and homelessness for all. Housing First is a nationally and internationally evidenced approach to ending homelessness underpinned by a clear set of principles: housing is a human right and people need a permanent, affordable home and appropriate support to end their homelessness.

While people may be familiar with Housing First as a programme – a highly effective service for people who have experienced trauma and have multiple and complex support needs – what Andy Burnham is advocating for is a transformational shift that applies the Housing First principles to whole of the housing and homelessness system. It’s not simply about tackling rough sleeping, it is about applying an urgency for permanent housing over temporary accommodation. This has the potential to be groundbreaking in addressing homelessness in England.

We have a lot of the building blocks to work from. First established in 2010 in England, Housing First has expanded to around 140 services countrywide and there have been three regional government pilots, with one in Greater Manchester. Crucially, it works – we see people able to sustain tenancies long-term, improvements to health and wellbeing, and more community integration. It also works for the economy – for those with the most complex support needs, it returns benefits well above its cost at roughly £2 saved for every £1 spent.

Finland is held up as the gold standard. By embedding Housing First across its entire homelessness system, it has achieved what many countries still consider aspirational – a sustained reduction in all forms of homelessness. Alongside Finland, Denmark, Japan and Spain have all demonstrated that homelessness can be reduced when secure housing, not temporary accommodation, becomes the starting point of support.

And yet a lack of political will has left this proven intervention sorely underutilised in England. Successive governments have been hesitant to scale up Housing First into a fully funded national programme, and the model has operated in parallel to the more traditional staircase homelessness system – where people are required to progress through a series of temporary housing stages before earning permanent independent housing.

We have also failed to apply the philosophy that guides Housing First to our overall approach to tackling homelessness. As a result, over 176,000 children are trapped in temporary accommodation and councils are spending more than £2.8 billion a year. At the same time a confused and expensive supported housing system, also intended to be temporary, is failing the thousands of people with significant health and social care needs trapping them in cycles of repeat homelessness. We’re paying huge sums to keep people homeless.

In Greater Manchester Andy Burnham has already taken the model a step further, beginning to integrate Housing First into the wider system – from ensuring the regional Housing First pilot evolved into a thriving mainstream service, to rolling out A Bed Every Night to ensure people are brought off the streets and connected to the right support they need to end their homelessness and implementing the Good Landlords Charter. And in 2024 he established a dedicated Housing First Unit to coordinate delivery across all ten boroughs.

Burnham’s aim is ambitious but completely achievable: to move away from costly, short-term accommodation and instead prioritise the creation of permanent homes, backed by genuinely affordable house building. He knows that the investment will be worth it, ending homelessness while reducing reliance on a range of costly health and social care services and the criminal justice system.

So, what would this look like nationally? Most importantly, it would mean a fundamental shift in mindset: away from managing homelessness as an endless emergency, and toward preventing and ending it altogether.

Integral to the approach is preventing the trauma of homelessness from happening in the first place. And in situations where it does occur, people would be moved into their own secure social or privately rented home as quickly as possible, without meeting strict conditions first, and then provided with the support they need to make it work.

This creates a system built around dignity, choice and what people need to thrive. Instead of asking people to navigate a maze of services before they can access a secure home, it first provides the stability needed for someone to rebuild their life and engage with support on their own terms.

Crucially, there would be minimal time spent in temporary accommodation and very few transitions before someone moves into a settled home. We currently have record numbers of households stuck in unsuitable accommodation for months on end. Homelessness has never been worse. But we’ve never known more about how to end it. And it’s those solutions we need to start investing in.

This means investing in addressing the chronic shortage of affordable homes through a renewed emphasis on social housebuilding, and whilst those houses are built, unfreezing Local Housing Allowance, which is pushing people into homelessness, leaving local authorities to bear the cost. It means ensuring social housing is allocated to people experiencing homelessness and supporting local authorities to plan and fund how they will transition from over reliance on temporary accommodation to rapidly rehousing everyone into a home of their own, with the support they need to keep it. We must empower mayors and local leaders to take bold, locally tailored action and establish a national Homelessness and Rough Sleeping Unit rooted in a Housing First philosophy to coordinate delivery and ensure consistency, with all departments pulling in the same direction and moving forward together.

We wholeheartedly welcome the prospect of a Housing First philosophy at the heart of Government. It would be transformative with benefits for employment, health, and economic growth. That’s why it must, as Andy Burnham says, be at the top of the country’s priority list.

Fiona Colley – Director of Social Change, Homeless Link

Francesca Albanese – Executive Director of Policy and Social Change, Crisis UK

Would you like to write for Red Brick? Email rose.grayston@gmail.com to pitch your piece (c.600-900 words)

Categories
Blog Post

The homelessness strategy must tackle surging rough sleeping

New data released this week shows that rough sleeping surged to over 9,500 in July 2025. Centre for Social Justice (CSJ) analysis shows this is a 94 per cent increase compared to the same period in 2021.

One of the most disturbing trends in this week’s data is the entrenchment of long-term rough sleeping. In September 2025, nearly 4,000 people had been seen sleeping rough for multiple months, an increase of over a quarter (28 per cent) since September 2023. Long-term rough sleepers are now the largest group of people sleeping rough on our streets.

The Labour government inherited much of this mess – but on its watch the problem has only gotten worse. Rough sleeping hasn’t fallen in the government’s first year, just the Minister and Secretary of State.

Charity groups have been told the homelessness strategy is imminent. This is the government’s chance to tackle these trends head on and bring about the change and renewal it has promised.

Alongside an expected emphasis on prevention and temporary accommodation, the homelessness strategy must also contain a plan to reverse rough sleeping numbers, particularly the growing number of people who have been living on our streets long-term.

More of the same won’t cut it. Often people who have been homeless for years, or have complex problems like drug addiction or mental illness, cannot access housing through the current system. Many live their lives drifting, being passed between prisons, hospital wards, and hostels – at risk to the public and to the dangers of life on the streets.

Alongside Andy Burnham and Steve Rotheram, the CSJ has outlined a fully costed plan which would tackle these trends head on: a national rollout of Housing First. This approach has been successfully piloted in Greater Manchester, Liverpool City Region and the West Midlands, where 84 per cent of clients sustained long term housing after three years.

Housing First begins with a simple but powerful principle: a permanent home. From that solid foundation, people can access the tailored, wraparound support they need to address deep-rooted challenges. It’s an approach grounded in common sense, recognising that no one can rebuild their life whilst trapped in an endless cycle of homelessness, emergency accommodation, and crisis services.

The evidence is resounding and for a government strapped for cash, it has a 2:1 return on investment. Our plan is also fully funded. For just £100 million, the government could take over 5,500 people off the streets by the end of the Parliament, paid for by scrapping expensive relocation expenses for civil servants and cutting back the programme which moves them to the regions.

For a government seeking national renewal, it is hard to imagine a better place to begin than by ending the visible symbol of state and societal failure that is rough sleeping. If the homelessness strategy doesn’t fix this, it will be judged a failure, no matter what else it achieves.

Categories
Blog Post

Ending rough sleeping needs more than a sticking plaster

In December, I gave evidence to the MHCLG select committee about the impact of Covid-19 on rough sleeping.  My message to them was we desperately need investment in front line housing advice and long-term funding for genuinely affordable housing to really tackle the complex causes of rough sleeping. The pandemic has shown is what is politically possible, but short-term sticking plasters really need to become longer term solutions – and now is the time to make that case to the Government.

At the start of the lockdown councils were told by the government to do ‘whatever it takes’ to support our communities. One of the actions we took was to quickly house rough sleepers. Prior to the pandemic hitting rough sleeping had been steadily increasing after a decade of austerity, having been all but eliminated under the last Labour government.

The ‘Everyone In’ initiative made local authorities responsible for housing rough sleepers and those at risk of rough sleeping. This was regardless of priority need, local connection or recourse to public funds. 

We stepped up to the challenge in Tower Hamlets, the borough I represent. Around 260 individuals either rough sleeping on the streets, or at imminent risk of rough sleeping, were given emergency accommodation. 49 of this group had No Recourse to Public Funds (NRPF). We placed entrenched rough sleepers into newly procured commercial hotels and emergency B&B accommodation. Statistics are one thing but each number represents a life transformed and having a roof over your head unlocks access to so many other services and life chances.

Now we face a situation of uncertainty about future funding to support this cohort of people. While the Government has called for councils to come up with a plan on how to move rough sleepers on to the next stage of accommodation, we have again stepped up, but we need funding to back us all the way.

The Next Steps Accommodation Programme, a £400m national fund, offers some help but the costs we face are substantial. Housing benefit claims won’t cover the cost of the support for a group with complex needs.  Ongoing announcements about additional funding streams create pressure on already under resourced teams to write ‘bids’ and applications for resources for projects that are so clearly needed. This relationship between local and national Government is breaking and needs urgently fixing.

Now we are in a further lockdown, with high levels of Covid cases and temperatures plummeting, we need the Government to make suitable provision. On a practical level normal provision such as hubs will not work as self-contained units are still required. If the Government does not get this right it will lead to an increase in infections. A decade of austerity has shown that if you simply turn off the funding taps in one area it leads to further pressures on other public services with longer term impacts on other services like the NHS.

It’s taken a time of crisis for the Government to step in and give councils the funding they need to tackle rough sleeping and they desperately need to address the long-term undersupply of genuinely affordable housing. If something good can come out of the pandemic, it’s eradicating rough sleeping. The Government has a real chance to not undo the progress we have made.

<strong><span class="uppercase"><span class="has-inline-color has-accent-color">Rachel Blake</span></span></strong>
Rachel Blake

Rachel is the Deputy Mayor for the London Borough of Tower Hamlets. She was elected to represent the Labour Party for Bow East Ward in May 2014 and appointed to Cabinet in July 2015.

Rachel has held Cabinet Member roles for Regeneration, Planning, and Air Quality. Rachel is now the Cabinet Member for Adults, Health and Well-being.

She has previously been called in as an expert witness to the Housing, Communities and Local Government Committee on its inquiry into the long-term delivery of social and affordable rented housing.